Russian Military Embarrassment - There could be worse ways to lose a tank, but the destruction of another T-90M 'Breakthrough' tank has the Russian leader very concerned. Because it is a victim of tactical incompetence that puts the tank in an impossible position, as well as the shameful failure of the defense system, which it has a lot of.
The Russian T-90M tank may have good marching characteristics on the Red Battlefield, but it is vulnerable to the battlefield ... [+]. (Note the anti-RPG mesh edge around the turret)
Russian Military Embarrassment
The T-90M is Russia's most advanced tank and is only available in small numbers. (The T-14 Armata is still in the testing phase and does not appear to be operational). Footage of the smoking barrel after the incident was not enough to confirm the kill, but drone footage of the incident showed the T-90M burning for a long time, with smoke billowing from inside the vehicle.
Ukraine War Must Teach India's 'bygone' Army To Use Same Military Model To Stalemate China
The longer drone video of full engagement is hard to decipher, as the drone is far away and the tank only takes up a few pixels on the screen, but it reveals some interesting details. One is that the tank is moving in front of the other tank when it is hit, and so on.. Seconds after the hit. She almost disappeared in the smoke that followed the attack, then (0:20) there was a violent explosion in the tank and it stopped.
At this time, the vehicle parked on the side of the road had turned around and was continuing to leave the work area. The explosion inside the T-90M will leave no survivors; The turret hatch in the later video is open, so the commander and gunner could have ejected and escaped when the tank was hit.
Since March, analysts have pointed to Russia's fundamental failure in the combined arms operation. In modern warfare, advanced tanks must be supported by ground troops to engage enemy ground troops with anti-tank weapons and artillery to suppress longer-range threats. Working together makes all elements more efficient and eliminates their weaknesses Sending tanks forward without support - which seems to be what happened here - leaves them extremely vulnerable. Infantry with shoulder-fired weapons can conduct short-range attacks and engage tanks from the side or rear.
This is a lesson that Russia did not learn in the early stages of the war. Now he is playing the same game with more expensive pieces. Basic T-72s cost around $500,000, the newer T-90Ms are said to be worth around $4.5 million.
After Ukraine Debacle, Nato Allies Rethink Russia's Military Prowess
A closer look at the video shows a second vehicle in the distance at the same time as the first. This also smokes badly, indicating the killing of others. It is possible for Russia to lose two of its award-winning T-90Ms at the same time.
We do not know which weapon destroyed the tank. Two different stories are circulating and both may be incorrect.
News in Ukraine said that a Ukrainian soldier shot at an AT4 tank. If true, that would be pretty impressive. The US-made and Swedish-supplied Saab AT4 is a shoulder-mounted light anti-aircraft weapon. The AT4 is an 84 mm gun emplacement; It is an unguided weapon, weighing only 15 pounds compared to 48 for the Javelin, with a range of 300 yards compared to Javelins 2,000+. It is usually called an 'anti-armour' weapon rather than an 'anti-tank' weapon because the small warhead is not (usually) powerful enough to destroy the frontal armor of modern main battle tanks.
The Ukrainians claim that the bullet was fired under the barrel of the T-90M gun, a metal shield around the gun itself. The mantlet has previously been identified as the weak point of Russian tanks. The weapon's stabilization system requires the barrel to be as light as possible, so armor tends to be thinner here.
War For Ukraine's Skies Set To Enter New Phase
The shot should not go far. The T-90M must be protected by Russia's latest anti-missile system, which detects incoming missiles with radar and shoots it down with interceptors. This is similar to Israel's highly successful Trophy system - none of the Trophy-equipped tanks were damaged by RPGs. Russia's latest version is claimed to be very effective, it can fight not only low-velocity missiles and rockets, but also anti-tank missiles that come at hypersonic speeds. AT4 should not pass. Either the system is not installed, or it is not being used properly... or it is not working.
There are indications that the Russians are aware of the dangers of injecting into this area in particular, with some. The photo shows the 'anti-RPG end' around the base of the T-90 turret. This type of protection only applies to RPG rounds with vulnerable fuses, not weapons like the AT4.
Look closely at the protective "skirt" around the base of the T-90M turret. Its presence indicates ... [+] known vulnerabilities
If AT4's claim is correct, the woman must have the nerve to wait until the barrel is in range, knowing she can only fire once. If he misses, the tank crew will shoot and kill him instantly, because the shot will make his position clear. It then hit a small, moving target - a gun barrel - resulting in the destruction of the tank.
Exclusive: Russian Officer Reveals Why He Risked It All To Quit Putin's War In Ukraine
In an alternate caption, an analyst on Twitter said the T-90M was actually destroyed by a smart cannon, the kind we first saw in July. However, the distinctive trail of falling flame and smoke trails left by this type of bomb do not appear to be visible in the drone footage, so this explanation is also questionable.
Russia's Uralvagonzavod recently announced that it has taken delivery of new T-90Ms and their factories are working around the clock to deliver more. Since this is the tenth T-90M lost, it is not clear that the mounted T-90M is any less vulnerable than its predecessor, especially when used without any tactical sense.
Incidentally, there are worse ways to lose a tank than the Russians recently demonstrated. come here According to a Russian source, Baza, last week Russian technicians in Belgorod accidentally set fire to the T-72 tank they were repairing. The bullet caught and exploded destroying the tank; Two T-72s were damaged in the incident. Like the loss of the T-90M, the incident points to deeper problems in the Russian military. NATO allies are rethinking Russia's military advances, but Russia's early military failures in Ukraine do not make it any less dangerous, military analysts warn.
New for followers: Click + to receive email notifications of new stories written by Robbie Gramer Robbie Gramer, Amy Mackinnon Amy Mackinnon
Vladimir Putin's Failing Invasion Is Fueling The Rise Of Russia's Far Right
Estonian troops and other NATO member countries take part in a large-scale military exercise in Tapa, Estonia on May 27, 2021. Raigo Pajula/AFP via Getty Images
During a decade and a half at the Pentagon, Christopher Skaluba has read countless reports and assessments about the Russian military and how it is fighting NATO forces. Now that he's gone and watched Russia's aggression against Ukraine for months, he has a new message for defense planners: "All those assessments I've read over the last decade and more are wrong."
Across NATO, defense planners are reassessing Moscow's military capabilities in the unlikely event of a conventional war between the alliance and Russia, according to current and former US and European defense officials. This assessment comes after Moscow's embarrassing military confrontation in Ukraine, with the Kremlin prepared to launch a full-scale military attack first.
Former NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said in an interview with Foreign Policy that there are two main assumptions that defense planners in major NATO capitals make. First of all, Mr. Rasmussen said: “We overestimated the strength of the Russian army. "Despite huge investments in military equipment and the reopening of old Soviet bases, we have seen a very weak Russian army."
Russia Reportedly Loses Most Advanced Tank In Ukraine
"The other miscalculation was that we underestimated the ruthlessness and ambition of President [Vladimir] Putin," Rasmussen added.
Now, in the capitals of Europe and North America, enthusiasm in the Ministry of Defense is taking a multi-year assessment of the progress of the Russian military and is beginning to question long-held assumptions about what a conventional war between NATO members would be. and Russia. .
"Whether it's morale or communication or a lack of preparation, there are many factors that add up to something you don't expect to see from an advanced military," Skaluba told the Russian military. The conditions or the assumption that they entered [Ukraine] are incorrect.”
One possible scenario that NATO's military has long been preparing for is a quick invasion of the Baltic states, on NATO's vulnerable eastern flank. NATO members have been planning and preparing for military maneuvers to retake those countries from Russian forces — assuming Russia can quickly overwhelm their troops and occupy the territory in the first place.
We Are Hacked\
After seeing how badly Russian troops were doing to Ukrainian forces, some Western national defense officials and planners encouraged NATO to reevaluate that plan: it seems more feasible, with the right size and combination of
Military drone range, laser range finder military, military range bags, military range targets, long range military radio, military radio range, military range finder, military long range binoculars, range rover military discount, military range rover, range of military drones, military range bag
0 Comments